FALLING FILMEVAPORATION SYSTEMS

Food-liquid suitability across the concentration path

The feed name opens the discussion. Outlet properties decide whether the proposed system remains workable.

01 / ENGINEERING CONTEXT

Describe the actual liquid

Identify solids, dissolved sugars, suspended particles, fibres, acidity and any tendency to foam or deposit. Include measurement temperature and the range between batches. A filtered juice and a pulpy purée need different evaluation even when made from the same fruit.

02 / ENGINEERING CONTEXT

Measure more than inlet viscosity

Provide viscosity against concentration at relevant temperatures. The cold laboratory sample alone may not represent hot operation, while a diluted feed sample does not represent final concentrate. Record the measurement method and shear conditions for non-Newtonian liquids.

03 / ENGINEERING CONTEXT

Recognise reasons to investigate alternatives

Strong fouling, crystallisation, large particles or a difficult outlet rheology may require a different evaporation concept, pre-treatment or a separate finishing stage. An initial calculation of water removal cannot establish falling-film suitability.

04 / ENGINEERING CONTEXT

Use a trial to resolve uncertainty

Agree what the sample represents, the intended concentration range, observations of deposition and the quality tests to perform. Translate trial findings into an operating envelope and a cleaning plan rather than one isolated maximum concentration.

Related equipment

Next decision

Continue your project review →